{"created":"2025-03-06T02:56:48.218353+00:00","id":2006682,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"99c836a5-ffa2-4b3a-a70f-a1c16f9c36b1"},"_deposit":{"created_by":82,"id":"2006682","owner":"82","owners":[82],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2006682"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:wakayama-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02006682","sets":["1728440704509:1728440822844","1728442251420:1728450711381:1740033840335"]},"author_link":["233"],"control_number":"2006682","item_1617186331708":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"営業制限法理の一側面 : CustomとBy-Lawsによる営業制限 : Mitchel v. Reynoldsにおける自由意思に基づかない制限の分析","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"エイギョウ セイゲン ホウリ ノ イチソクメン Custom ト By-Laws ニ ヨル エイギョウ セイゲン : Mitchel v. Reynolds ニ オケル ジユウ イシ ニ モトズカナイ セイゲン ノ ブンセキ","subitem_title_language":"ja-Kana"},{"subitem_title":"Another Side of the Restraint of Trade Doctrine : An Analysis of the Involuntary Restraints in Mitchel v. Reynolds","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_1617186419668":{"attribute_name":"作成者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorAffiliations":[{"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationName":"和歌山大学","affiliationNameLang":"ja"},{"affiliationName":"Wakayama University","affiliationNameLang":"en"}]}],"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"伊藤, 政也","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"ITOH, Masaya","creatorNameLang":"en"},{"creatorName":"イトウ, マサヤ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"familyNames":[{"familyName":"伊藤","familyNameLang":"ja"},{"familyName":"ITOH","familyNameLang":"en"},{"familyName":"イトウ","familyNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"givenNames":[{"givenName":"政也","givenNameLang":"ja"},{"givenName":"Masaya","givenNameLang":"en"},{"givenName":"マサヤ","givenNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"233","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"},{"nameIdentifier":"100001443_ja.html","nameIdentifierScheme":"研究者総覧","nameIdentifierURI":"https://researchers.center.wakayama-u.ac.jp/html/100001443_ja.html"},{"nameIdentifier":"read20847959","nameIdentifierScheme":"researchmap","nameIdentifierURI":"https://researchmap.jp/read20847959"}]}]},"item_1617186476635":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_1617186609386":{"attribute_name":"主題","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"営業制限法理","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other","subitem_subject_uri":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E5%96%B6%E6%A5%AD%E5%88%B6%E9%99%90%E6%B3%95%E7%90%86"},{"subitem_subject":"コモン・ロー","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other","subitem_subject_uri":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A2%E3%83%B3%E3%83%BB%E3%83%AD%E3%83%BC"},{"subitem_subject":"独占","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other","subitem_subject_uri":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=%E7%8B%AC%E5%8D%A0"},{"subitem_subject":"restraint of trade","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other","subitem_subject_uri":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=restraint+of+trade"},{"subitem_subject":"Common Law","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other","subitem_subject_uri":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=Common+Law"},{"subitem_subject":"Monopoly","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other","subitem_subject_uri":"https://cir.nii.ac.jp/all?q=Monopoly"}]},"item_1617186626617":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of judicial analysis regarding involuntary restraints in Mitchel v. Reynolds (1711). This case has been cited as the root of the Restraint of Trade Doctrine by Antitrust cases in the U.S., but the part about involuntary restraints has not been studied so far. This paper examines the tendency of decisions in cases concerning Custom and By-Laws, going back to the cases referred to in Mitchel v. Reynolds. These are relevant to the anti-monopoly tendency of Common Law, but rather to the importance of judicial review of the laws by private entities. In this judicial review, the reasonableness of the restraint of trade has been evaluated in relation to consideration (mutual advantages), proportionality of the penalty, and freedom of trade. Custom and By-Laws are often mentioned with privileges to restrain trade, but as far as the decision cited by the Mitchel case is concerned, it is evident that the courts considered that involuntary restraints should be reviewed under the test of reasonableness. Although part of the involuntary restraints was not ratio decidendi in the case, there has been commonality with the test of reasonableness in the voluntary restraints.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_1617186643794":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"和歌山大学経済学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_1617186702042":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"},{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_1617186920753":{"attribute_name":"収録物識別子","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"04516222","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"},{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00071425","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1617187056579":{"attribute_name":"bibliographic_information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2024-09-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicNumberOfPages":"14","bibliographicPageEnd":"14","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"418","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"経済理論","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"The Wakayama economic review","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1617265215918":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_1617353299429":{"attribute_name":"関連情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"1520302248603675776","subitem_relation_type_select":"CRID"}}]},"item_1617604990215":{"attribute_name":"ファイル","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2025-03-06"}],"filename":"AN00071425.418.1.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"447 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://wakayama-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2006682/files/AN00071425.418.1.pdf"},"version_id":"0ba395ac-5862-49aa-a00d-99fa084fa151"}]},"item_1623818042585":{"attribute_name":"identifier_registration","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.19002/0002006682","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_1725499675744":{"attribute_name":"item_1725499675744","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"営業制限法理の一側面 : CustomとBy-Lawsによる営業制限 : Mitchel v. Reynoldsにおける自由意思に基づかない制限の分析","item_type_id":"40002","owner":"82","path":["1728440822844","1740033840335"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2025-03-13"},"publish_date":"2025-03-13","publish_status":"0","recid":"2006682","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["営業制限法理の一側面 : CustomとBy-Lawsによる営業制限 : Mitchel v. Reynoldsにおける自由意思に基づかない制限の分析"],"weko_creator_id":"82","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2025-05-09T01:12:27.523483+00:00"}